Search for: "F. Tv Ltd." Results 1 - 20 of 110
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2011, 3:40 pm by Eric Schweibenz
Patent Nos. 7,972,022 (the ‘022 patent), 7,510,290 (the ‘290 patent), 7,429,117 (the ‘117 patent), 7,318,652 (the ‘652 patent), and 6,948,823 (the ‘823 patent) (collectively, the “asserted patents”): FloLight, LLC of Campbell, California Prompter People, Inc. of Campbell, California Ikan Corporation of Houston, Texas Advanced Business Computer Services, LLC of Reno, Nevada Elation Lighting, Inc. of Los Angeles, California Fotodiox Inc. of Waukegan, Illinois… [read post]
22 May 2019, 4:35 am
Mr Mark Duffy, the company director, explained that The Pets Factor was a TV Format that was pitched to the usual TV companies and he had some interest from the BBC and All3media.The registration was opposed by FremantleMedia Ltd and Simco Limited on the grounds of likelihood of confusion with their six earlier marks The X Factor. [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 9:49 pm by Alex Gasser
According to the Notice of Investigation, the ITC has identified the following entities as respondents in this investigation: • FloLight, LLC of Campbell, California • Prompter People, Inc. of Campbell, California • IKAN Corporation of Houston, Texas • Advanced Business Computer Services, LLC of Reno, Nevada • Elation Lighting, Inc. of Los Angeles, California • Fotodiox Inc. of Waukegan, Illinois • Fuzhou F&V… [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm by Public Employment Law Press
The petition also fails to adequately allege that ACS violated the Family Medical Leave Act, as petitioner did not assert that he had worked for ACS for 12 months or 1,250 hours, and thus failed to demonstrate that he was an eligible employee under 29 USC § 2611(2)(A)(ii) (see Donahue v Asia TV USA Ltd., 208 F Supp 3d 505, 512 [SD NY 2016]). [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm by Public Employment Law Press
The petition also fails to adequately allege that ACS violated the Family Medical Leave Act, as petitioner did not assert that he had worked for ACS for 12 months or 1,250 hours, and thus failed to demonstrate that he was an eligible employee under 29 USC § 2611(2)(A)(ii) (see Donahue v Asia TV USA Ltd., 208 F Supp 3d 505, 512 [SD NY 2016]). [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 7:30 am
Article 3(1)(f) of Trade Mark Directive 2008/95 provides that"(f) trade marks which are contrary to public policy or to accepted principles of morality"shall not be registered, and 15 U.S.C. para 1052(a) of the Lanham Act in the USA provides that registration shall be refused to a mark which"Consists of or comprises immoral, deceptive, or scandalous matter; or matter which may disparage or falsely suggest a connection with persons, living or dead, institutions,… [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 8:31 am by Rosalind English
Applying an objective test, the instant advertisement sought to obtain information which would be used to try to make changes to society and would fall within sections 321(3)(b), 321(3)(c), 321(3)(d) or 321(3)(f) of the Communications Act  . [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 12:47 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Trudeau, --- F.3d ----, 2011 WL 5927435 (7th Cir.)Some background. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 5:13 pm by INFORRM
Applying an objective test, the instant advertisement sought to obtain information which would be used to try to make changes to society and would fall within sections 321(3)(b), 321(3)(c), 321(3)(d) or 321(3)(f) of the Communications Act  . [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 9:23 am by Ben
The recent case of The Adventures of Robinson Curiosity  might give us some clues: That case centred on Claude Robinson's creation, in the early 1980s, of preliminary sketches and scripts for a prospective TV series for children that he called Robinson Curiosité; In 1995, Cinar and co-producers France Animation and Ravensburger introduced a new TV series, Robinson Sucroé, with characters strikingly similar to Robinson’s concept. [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 4:56 am
Citibank (Citibank II) 936 F.2d 723 (1991). [read post]